Dying to the Ego to Live from a New Centre
- Andrew Ormiston
- Jan 19, 2018
- 10 min read

Everyday life has a way of pulling us outward. It does not ask permission. It does not knock. It simply arrives—through responsibilities, interruptions, expectations, noise, urgency—and, before we realise what has happened, the day has recruited our attention and set the tempo of our inner world.
We start responding rather than choosing. We start navigating rather than inhabiting. The smallest inconveniences begin to irritate us. The simplest tasks feel heavier than they should. We move through hours that are full of activity yet oddly empty of meaning, and we wonder, quietly, why we feel so stressed, so depleted, so emotionally thin.
Most of us do not want to live this way. We want to become the more loving version of ourselves—the one who is patient, resilient, present, capable of holding the tensions of ordinary life without spilling them into every conversation. Scripture gives us a luminous portrait of this kind of life. But many Christians experience an ache between the portrait and the mirror. We can admire the vision and still fail to embody it. And the harder we strive to maintain it through sheer effort, the more often we fall to the pressures of the day.
It begins to feel like we cannot keep up.
And perhaps that is the first honest truth.
The Outer Game Never Ends
There is a kind of exhaustion that does not come from laziness but from an unending scoreboard. The outer game—achievement, performance, productivity, approval—resets every morning. You complete one list and the next appears. You resolve one problem and another arrives. Even the things you do well are swallowed by the next demand. The score rarely tallies. Gratitude feels like a luxury. Meaning feels postponed.
The tragedy is not simply that we work hard. It is that we begin to live as though the outer game is the measure of our worth and the proof of our faithfulness. We treat life as a series of obligations to survive rather than a reality to participate in. We begin to endure our days rather than inhabit them.
Paul’s language about “running the race” is often misheard as motivation for religious productivity—as though the prize is awarded to the most efficient and devout. But Paul is not urging us to win at busyness. The race he describes is not the outer game. It is the inner contest of governance: what rules the soul? what sets the mind? what shapes our responses?
If the centre is wrong, the whole life wobbles—no matter how impressive it looks.
The Inner Government of the Soul
Paul writes with disarming clarity: “The mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace.” By “flesh” he does not mean merely the body, nor does he reduce the problem to obvious moral failures. He is describing a mode of life organised apart from God: self-managed, ego-driven, reactive, anxious—an existence governed by a centre that cannot bear the weight it has been asked to carry.
It is what many of us call autopilot.
Not because autopilot is wicked, but because it is limited. It is the inherited system of coping that learns to predict threats, secure approval, avoid pain, maintain control. It can look sensible. It can look responsible. It can even look like righteousness. But left unexamined, it becomes the hidden governor of the inner life.
And when autopilot governs, even ordinary life begins to feel like turbulence. The storm is not only outside. It is inside—tightening the chest, narrowing the mind, sharpening the tongue, preparing defensive scripts we didn’t consciously choose.
There is another way to live. But it requires a different centre.
The Voice We Mistake for Ourselves
Most self-help systems assume that if you can gather the right strategies, you can overcome the barriers in front of you. Find the right expert. Acquire the right principles. Apply yourself with enough discipline. Break through. Win.
Sometimes this works—at least for a while. But many people discover a stubborn reality: they can understand the truth, agree with it, and still fail to change. They can read the best ideas and still relapse into the same patterns. They can “know better” and still react the same.
Because the deeper obstacle is rarely a lack of information. It is a question of governance.
There is a voice inside us that has been present for so long we assume it is us. It has helped us make sense of the world, protected us from danger, taught us what matters, and ensured our survival in countless subtle ways. It is not evil. It is necessary. But it is also capable of becoming absolute.
Call it the ego. Call it the self-manager. Call it the anxious governor. Traditions name it differently, but the experience is recognisable: a running commentary that interprets, judges, predicts, compares, blames, justifies, and narrows life to what feels safe.
Its most convincing trick is not malice but identification. It speaks its conclusions as though they are your thoughts. It offers its fear as though it is wisdom. It presents its protective strategies as though they are your identity.
And it justifies its reign with a promise: Your heart has been hurt. I will protect you. Listen to me.
The Lens We See Through
Some beliefs are taught to us outright—through family, culture, education, religion, politics, and community. But there is another layer of belief that is not consciously installed. It is caught. It is absorbed. It forms quietly beneath the surface until it no longer appears as an idea we hold, but as the lens through which we perceive reality.
These assumptions are difficult to reflect upon because they are not something we see; they are something we see by.
When we experience something new, especially something painful or confusing, the mind scrambles to make meaning. It connects dots. It builds stories. It frames causes and conclusions. It does this not because it is evil but because it is trying to regain orientation. Coherence feels like safety.
And when the heart is in pain, the mind is most vulnerable to installing conclusions without sufficient truth. Emotional distress narrows awareness. It accelerates interpretation. It limits reflection. In those moments, meanings are written quickly and stored deeply.
When caregivers yelled, when friends betrayed trust, when teachers ignored us, when the world felt indifferent, something inside us worked hard to explain why. While our attention was consumed by anger or fear or confusion, the ego drew conclusions: I am not safe. I am not enough. To be loved I must perform. If I am weak I will be harmed. If I do not control the situation, I will be abandoned.
The ego was not trying to ruin our lives. It was trying to survive them. But survival scripts make poor life scripts. What protected us at ten can suffocate us at thirty.
These interpretations become the operating system by which we function as adults: a mixture of life-giving beliefs and limiting ones. And because the system is familiar, we assume it is reality. We treat our internal map as though it is the terrain.
Then we wonder why we cannot change.
How the Inner Storm Spills Outward
This is why spiritual formation is not primarily about adding more outer behaviours. Outer behaviours matter, but they cannot substitute for inner governance. Without inner attention, the soul accumulates pressure and leaks it sideways.
Consider something painfully ordinary.
I may be working on my computer when a low-grade frustration begins to build. The task feels harder than it should. Progress is slow. Irritation grows. My attention is fixed on solving the external problem, while the internal storm goes unnoticed. I might step away from the task, but I cannot step away from what has accumulated inside me.
Later, I encounter my wife. A trivial disagreement—maybe about how to stack the dishwasher—becomes the outlet for what I failed to address earlier. She is hurt. I am left feeling guilty and confused about how something so small escalated so quickly.
But if, instead, I pause and turn inward—recognising the frustration, naming it, and offering it to Christ—I am no longer tightly wound. The charge reduces. When I later speak with her, I do so from a calmer place. Patience becomes available not because I forced it, but because the inner pressure has been relieved.
How many small inconveniences lodge inside us each day? How many careless words become a defensive monologue later? How often do we defer our hopes, citing limitations as excuses? And how often do we blame others for reactions that were already being prepared within us?
Without maintenance of the inner life—opening windows, watering what is growing, removing what is rotting—the internal world becomes cramped and heavy. Eventually we do not have the resources to rise to the occasion.
The tragedy is that we keep trying to win the outer game, while the inner world quietly runs the show.
What It Means to “Die”
Here the spiritual language becomes sharp. The gospel does not merely offer self-improvement. It speaks of death and resurrection. Yet many misunderstand this as hatred of the self, or annihilation of humanity, or the crushing of personality. That is not the point.
To die, in the Christian sense, is not to stop existing. It is the end of an old regime. It is the relinquishing of a centre that can no longer rule without deforming the soul.
The ego does not need to be demonised. It needs to be dethroned.
This is why repentance is deeper than moral regret. At its root it means a turning—a reorientation of the inner life from one centre to another. The ego is not destroyed; its supremacy is. It is returned to its proper place: a servant, not a king.
Paul’s words are not poetic exaggeration but structural description: “It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me.” That sentence does not erase the self. It reorganises it. It announces a new centre of governance.
When Christ becomes the organising presence within, the inner world is no longer held together by self-protection as the highest good. Another centre begins to rule—one capable of bearing suffering without collapse, conflict without cruelty, vulnerability without panic.
This is not instant. It happens in layers. The ego can surrender in one domain while remaining entrenched in another. A person may trust God in theology and still be ego-governed in money, intimacy, productivity, conflict, identity, or self-worth. This is why many Christians feel inconsistent: not because they are insincere, but because governance is contested.
The question is not, “Do I believe in God?”It is, “Who is ruling in this moment?”
The Indwelling Christ and the Spacious Soul
What does it mean, practically, for Christ to dwell within a person?
It cannot mean that we become passive, blank, or robotic. It does not mean the disappearance of our humanity. It means that a new presence becomes the organising centre of perception and action. The ego remains functional—capable of planning, problem solving, and ordinary management—but it no longer carries ultimate authority.
And because Christ is not merely an external ideal but an indwelling presence, transformation is not limited to outer compliance. It reaches the place where scripts were written. The places guarded by shame. The places where fear solidified into identity. The places where pain installed meaning.
This is why devotional practice is not spiritual decoration. It is training in governance. It is the daily turning inward—not into introspective obsession, but into attentive awareness before God—where the mind learns to recognise what is rising, what is being protected, and what is truly needed.
Over time, the inner life becomes more spacious. The ego becomes less frantic. The heart becomes more truthful. Christ becomes less theoretical and more experiential—less an idea we agree with, and more a centre we live from.
We begin to notice the storm earlier. We begin to respond rather than react. We begin to inhabit our days rather than endure them.
The Quiet Miracle
Personal growth has been described as becoming bigger than your problems. There is something true about that, but Christian formation names it more precisely. We do not become bigger by inflating the ego. We become bigger by being re-centred in love.
Like David, we often receive a calling that seems disproportionate to our current capacity. We stand before giants—internal and external—and the old narratives rise immediately: You don’t have what it takes. You will fail. You are too late. You are not enough. The ego offers its familiar counsel: control more, perform harder, prove yourself, never be weak.
But the path of faith is not the path of proving. It is the path of surrender. We act not from self-confidence but from trust in a power not generated by the ego’s anxious engines. Over time, through repeated engagement, the things that once dominated us lose their hold. New territory is integrated. The soul enlarges.
And this is where the world’s greatest con is finally exposed: the ego promised safety, but it could never produce peace. It could produce relief, control, certainty, and pride—but not peace. Peace belongs to another centre.
To die to the ego is therefore not to diminish. It is to come into alignment with what is most real. The ego’s deepest fear is displacement because it has carried burdens it was never meant to carry. Yet the quiet miracle is this: when the ego is no longer asked to be God, it can finally rest.
The Christian claim is not that the self must be erased, but that it must be re-centred. When Christ becomes the organising presence within, the exhausting project of self-salvation begins to loosen. The soul no longer has to be built on fear. Life no longer has to be negotiated as a threat. The heart is allowed to speak again—not as a fragile impulse to be overridden, but as a place where truth is encountered and love is formed.
This is why death and resurrection belong together. What dies is not the self, but the tyranny of self-rule. What rises is not a perfected ego, but a life increasingly shaped by love. The ego does not vanish; it finds its proper place. It becomes a voice rather than a throne.
The invitation of Christ is not to try harder, but to yield more deeply. Not to climb higher, but to come home. To stop mistaking anxious vigilance for wisdom. To trust the presence within that does not need to be proved, defended, or controlled.
This is the narrow path not because it is severe, but because it is honest.
And this is the quiet end of the con: that what we feared would diminish us is precisely what allows us to become whole.




Comments